You are currently viewing Troubleshooting A Sub-relationship Named Problem Already Exists.

Troubleshooting A Sub-relationship Named Problem Already Exists.

Updated

  • 1. Download ASR Pro
  • 2. Run the program
  • 3. Click "Scan Now" to find and remove any viruses on your computer
  • Speed up your computer today with this simple download.

    Over the past few days, some of our users have encountered an error message that a child relationship is already specified. This problem is caused by many factors. Let’s discuss this now.

    • Solved Issues
    • These Questions

    girishbhandari

    Hi, I’m getting an error: “A named child relationship may already exist” for the following fields to migrate from ANT .< /p>

    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c.object(658,13): A child relationship already exists that should be bids for the user.
    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c . object(681,13): A child relationship named Bid_Requests already exists for an opportunity.
    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c.object(713,13): A child relationship named Bid_Requests1 already exists for the user.< br>Error: objects /Bid_Request__c.object(725,13): The contact already has a Bid_Requests subrelation.
    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c.object(748,13): The Bid_Requests subrelation already exists in the contact. contact.relation called Bid_Requests in account.
    Error: Objects/Bid_Request__c.object(952,13): There is already a sub-relation for users called Bid_Requests.

    This is basically a sub-relation between standard objects(” Opportunity”, “User”, “Contact”, “Account A”) and/or a new custom “BidRequest” object.

    Updated

    Are you tired of your computer running slow? Annoyed by frustrating error messages? ASR Pro is the solution for you! Our recommended tool will quickly diagnose and repair Windows issues while dramatically increasing system performance. So don't wait any longer, download ASR Pro today!


    When I first implemented the from to dev test environment, I deployedIt worked fine, then I deleted all the deployed custom objects.
    Later when I reappeared, the new deployment failed.

    What’s really weird is that the target environment ( sandbox) doesn’t contain all custom fields above “relationshipLabel” but I always get an error .

    You Must Be Logged In With A Warning Sign.

    Close

    • Resolved issues
    • This issue

    Hi, I seem to be getting an error: “A named ideal child relationship already exists” for the following fields with ANT script migration.

    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c.object(658,13): A child relationship named RFP for user already exists in your garage.
    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c.object(681,13): A child relationship already exists. Relationship labeled Bid_Requests for opportunity.
    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c.object(713,13): An absolute child relationship named Bid_Requests1 already exists for the user.
    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c.object(725, 13) : A child relationship named Bid_Requests already exists in the contact.
    Error:objects/Bid_Request__c.object(748,13): A child relationship named Bid_Requests already exists in the account.
    Error: objects/Bid_Request__c . object( 952,13): there will already be a Bid_Requests child relation above the user.

    error there is already a child relationship named

    This is essentially the primary parent-child relationship between objects (Opportunity, User, Contact, Account) and the new tradition of “BidRequest” objects.

    When I was first sandboxed by a deployed developer, everything worked fine. I then removed all provided custom objects.
    Later, when my partner redeployed again, it failed.

    What’s really weird is that the affected environment (sandbox) doesn’t have a custom field with any of the “relationshipLabel” above, but I’m still getting the error.

    You Will Be Prompted To Sign In, Which Unfortunately You Will Have To Do.

    error there is already a child relationship named

    This post will be updated from time to time to serve as a knowledge base on how to troubleshoot less obvious SFDC error messages. Shopping list based on emotional experiences

    1. Read-only sharing model on Parent__c
    2. Parent element set by user A.
    3. User B inserts/updates a child tree in a master-detail relationship with Parent__c
    4. There is no sharing principle extending the user’s write access to B during parent__c. For example, the user testmethod is not in a role that includes Parent__c.
    1. Private sharing model for OWD on Parent__c. Criteria based exchange to extend owner Parent__c to specific test method role B
    2. Apex Context
    3. User A inserts parent
    4. User B inserts a child record with a lookup that parent__c can check
    5. apex does not honor criteria-based placement. The solution is to insert both parent and child of the same user.
    1. Object X has a connection lookup with object Y.
    2. If object X is definitely updated or inserted when the value of X.lookup_y__c matches an identifier that is probably valid for object type y but has a value, then it does not exist in the database
    3. Common examples occur when X is cloned from something else, e.g. X is synced from another SFDC organization.
    1. Part object D is part M to be mastered.
    2. Whether the operation is being performed on the object via API or APEX.
    3. If object D is inserted without reference to the main ID field. (Example: inject OrderItem without OrderItem.OrderId
    4. A typical example is any misconfigured middleware where you expected an update but configured it accordingly. Doesn’t show up when using the standard UI because layout usually requires a main field.
    1. Insert a specific OpportunityLineItem, QuoteItem, or OrderItem
    2. PricebookEntryID refers to PricebookEntry for Pricebook P.
    3. Parent Opportunity, Offer or Order has Pricebook2Id Pricebook Q
    1. Active connection so that it is not possible to contact partners of the organization
    2. sPublished objects in people organization
    3. You include these sObjects in your test code/methods.
    1. Active relationship with a partner organization
    2. SObjects published to partners can beBe disorganized.
    3. Subscriber to sObjects in partner organization
    4. You insert sObjects into your test code/methods.
    1. Active connection to selected organization
    2. Share a child post (e.g. opportunity)
    3. But the parent entry (e.g. account) has not yet been accepted.
    1. The active user has little or no federation ID, and
    2. Logged in user profile declared with SSO enabled, which is true

    You cannot revoke the tots role in a portal that grants an account to affiliated users.

    1. You are trying to redefine (not properly redefine) the role of user u.
    2. This user is the owner of one or more accounts that have been activated as an account partner. (via SFDC Partner Portal)

    This is definitely a solution for finding all those users own credits that are affiliate accounts. Then you can use plist view with filtering by partner account set to true. In our case, most of us were no longer using the partner portal and did some cleanup of roles by simply linking each account as a “partner account” and creating a

    Speed up your computer today with this simple download.

    오류 이름이 이미 지정된 하위 관계가 있습니다.
    Ошибка: уже есть дочерняя связь с именем
    Fout Er Is Al Een Kindrelatie Genoemd
    Errore Esiste Già Una Relazione Figlio Nominata
    Erreur Il Existe Déjà Une Relation Enfant Nommée
    Błąd, że Istnieje Już Związek Potomny
    Error Ya Hay Una Relación Secundaria Nombrada
    Fel Det Finns Redan Ett Barnförhållande Som Heter
    Fehler Es Wurde Bereits Eine Untergeordnete Beziehung Benannt
    Erro Já Existe Um Relacionamento Filho Chamado